Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Assessment/Cordless Larry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cordless Larry's PPI Assessment Page

[edit]

Cordless Larry - Wikipedia expert

Assessment 1, part 1

[edit]

The purpose of this evaluation in not to gauge variability in article quality, but to look at the metric itself. How consistent is this assessment tool? and Is there a difference in scores between subject area expert assessment and Wikipedian article assessment?

  • Comprehensiveness - 6/10
  • Sourcing - 3/6
  • Neutrality - 2/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 1/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 15/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 7/10
  • Sourcing - 2/6
  • Neutrality - 2/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 1/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 15/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 4/10
  • Sourcing - 2/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 0/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 10/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 2/10
  • Sourcing - 3/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 1/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 10/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 4/10
  • Sourcing - 3/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 0/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 11/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 5/10
  • Sourcing - 2/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 2/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 13/26

Assessment 1, part 2

[edit]

Assessment request 2, please use article version from 1 October 2010. There are a couple of rereviews, hopefully those will go fast for you. This set will tie up the first assessment, which tests the quantitative metric and compares Wikipedian assessment to expert assessment. Sorry the article titles don't link to the correct article version, I will do this in the future.


  • Comprehensiveness - 7/10
  • Sourcing - 4/6
  • Neutrality - 2/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 1/2
  • Formatting - 2/2
  • Total - 18/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 2/10
  • Sourcing - 0/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 0/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 6/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 5/10
  • Sourcing - 1/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 1/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 11/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 2/10
  • Sourcing - 0/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 1/3
  • Illustrations - 0/2
  • Formatting - 0/2
  • Total - 4/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 3/10
  • Sourcing - 2/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 0/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 9/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 7/10
  • Sourcing - 2/6
  • Neutrality - 2/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 1/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 15/26
  • Comprehensiveness - 5/10
  • Sourcing - 3/6
  • Neutrality - 1/3
  • Readability - 2/3
  • Illustrations - 0/2
  • Formatting - 1/2
  • Total - 12/26